> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://musubinetwork.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Trust Model

> Multi-party signing authority, dual control, and the role-based trust model.

<Note>
  **Updated 2026-06-19 for the member-owned / operator-less pivot.** Musubi is a member-owned, operator-less, atomic & private settlement rail with no on-ledger compliance layer (per-participant compliance is off-ledger). Content below verified current as of this date; for the governance model see [ADR-0024](../../adr/0024-member-owned-operator-less-governance.md).
</Note>

Musubi enforces trust through a multi-party signing model. No single party can move assets or execute settlements unilaterally. Every settlement requires cryptographic agreement from four independent parties.

Musubi is **operator-less**: the Core coordinator co-submits on every settlement (a protocol *mechanic* — see [ADR-0001](../../adr/0001-operator-cosubmission.md)), but no standing operator *owns* or unilaterally *controls* the network (a *governance* property — see [ADR-0024](../../adr/0024-member-owned-operator-less-governance.md)). The network is member-owned; Core coordinates, it does not govern. Musubi carries no KYC/AML or compliance data on-ledger — it is entirely each participant's own off-ledger concern.

## Four-Party Settlement Signing

Before any atomic DvP executes, all four parties must authorize:

| Party                  | What They Authorize                                                                     | TradFi Parallel                     |
| ---------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------- |
| **Core coordinator**   | Coordinates the 4-party settlement and co-submits — does not own or control the network | Exchange/CCP coordinating a trade   |
| **Sender Custodian**   | Releases sender's source stablecoin                                                     | Custody bank releasing funds        |
| **Market Maker**       | Commits target stablecoin liquidity                                                     | Counterparty committing to delivery |
| **Receiver Custodian** | Confirms receipt capability                                                             | Custody bank accepting inbound      |

If any party refuses or fails to respond, settlement does not proceed and no assets move. This is more conservative than most traditional settlement systems — CLS Bank requires only the two commercial banks to pre-fund; Musubi requires all four participants to explicitly authorize.

## Dual Control: Institution + Custodian

Every trade requires two independent authorizations from the sending side:

| Step                  | Who         | What                                                     | Enforcement                |
| --------------------- | ----------- | -------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------- |
| 1. Select quote       | Institution | Reviews competing quotes, picks the best rate            | API call                   |
| 2. Authorize movement | Custodian   | Co-signs the quote acceptance, authorizing asset release | Cryptographic co-signature |

Neither party can act alone:

* The **institution** cannot move assets without the custodian's co-signature
* The **custodian** cannot initiate a trade — only authorize one the institution requested

This maps directly to the **maker-checker / four-eyes principle** used in institutional operations, enforced by the settlement protocol rather than by internal procedure. The custodian's co-signature is cryptographic — it cannot be forged, bypassed, or retroactively granted.

## Who Holds What Authority

| Authority                   | Held By          | Purpose                                                                                                           |
| --------------------------- | ---------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Intent signing**          | Institution      | Proves the institution authorized the payment (non-repudiation)                                                   |
| **Asset movement**          | Custodian        | Controls when and how much stablecoin leaves custody                                                              |
| **Liquidity commitment**    | Market Maker     | Commits target currency for the swap                                                                              |
| **Settlement coordination** | Core coordinator | Coordinates settlement and co-submits the atomic DvP (coordination only — no ownership or control of the network) |

The institution proves *intent*. The custodian controls *assets*. These are separate keys held by separate organizations — neither can impersonate the other.

## Musubi: Coordinator, Not Counterparty

| What Musubi Does                                      | What Musubi Does NOT Do                          |
| ----------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ |
| Co-submits on the order and verifies party signatures | Hold or custody any assets                       |
| Broadcasts anonymized RFQs to market makers           | Set or influence FX rates                        |
| Coordinates the 4-party settlement signing            | Move assets without custodian authorization      |
| Executes the atomic DvP transaction                   | Access participants' internal systems            |
| Provides settlement confirmations                     | Act as counterparty to any trade                 |
|                                                       | Own, govern, or unilaterally control the network |

**TradFi parallel**: Musubi is to stablecoin settlement what CLS Bank is to FX settlement — it coordinates simultaneous delivery of both currency legs without ever taking ownership. The critical difference: settlement completes in seconds, not hours.

## Comparison to Traditional Settlement

| Aspect                   | Traditional (CLS/Correspondent)       | Musubi                                      |
| ------------------------ | ------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- |
| **Who authorizes**       | Bank's internal approval chain        | Cryptographic co-signatures from 4 parties  |
| **Settlement guarantee** | CLS PvP within settlement window      | Atomic DvP — single transaction             |
| **Pre-funding**          | Required during CLS window            | Not required — instant atomic execution     |
| **Counterparty risk**    | Mitigated by CLS, not eliminated      | Eliminated — no time gap between legs       |
| **Authorization bypass** | Possible via internal process failure | Impossible — cryptographically enforced     |
| **Audit trail**          | SWIFT messages + internal logs        | Single `transaction_hash` covering all legs |
